Decision | Consent Granted Section 12(b) Overseas Investment Act 2005 Section 13(1)(a) Overseas Investment Act 2005 |
---|---|
Decision date | 15 December 2010 |
Investment | An overseas investment in sensitive land, being the Applicant's acquisition of rights or interests in 100.0% of the ordinary shares of Sucrogen Limited which owns or controls:
An overseas investment in significant business assets, being the Applicant's acquisition of rights or interests in 100.0% of the ordinary shares of Sucrogen Limited, the value of the assets of Sucrogen Limited and its 25% or more subsidiaries being greater than $100m. |
Consideration | Exceeds NZ$100,000,000 |
Applicant | Wilmar Australia Pty Limited Kuok group of companies (including Kerry Group Limited, Kuok Brothers Sdn Berhad, and Kuok (Singapore) Limited, Singapore (31.8%) Singapore Public (29.6%) Archer Daniels Midland Company, United States of America (16.4%) Kuok Khoon Hong, Singapore (12.0%) Martua Sitorus, Indonesia (10.2%) |
Vendor | Existing shareholders of Sucrogen Limited Australian Public (49.61%) National Nominees Limited, Australia (15.5%) JP Morgan Nominees Australia Limited, Australia (13.16%) HSBC Custody Nominees (Australia) Limited, Australia (10.4%) ANZ Nominees Limited, Australia (3.79%) Citicorp Nominees Pty Limited, Australia (2.68%) Cogent Nominees Pty Limited, Australia (2.0%) United Kingdom Public (1.95%) Various, Various (0.91%) |
Background | The ultimate holding company of the Applicant is Wilmar International Limited (WIL), a Singapore based agribusiness group. Sucrogen Limited (Sucrogen) is the largest sugar refiner in Australia and New Zealand and the eighth largest producer globally. WIL intends to work with Sucrogen’s existing management to enhance the Australian and New Zealand operations and to pursue growth opportunities in the Asia Pacific region. The Investment will likely result in greater volumes of sugar being processed in New Zealand, and greater export receipts being generated. The overseas investment transaction has satisfied the criteria in sections 16 and 18 of the Overseas Investment Act 2005. The 'benefit to New Zealand' criterion was satisfied by particular reference to the following factors: Overseas Investment Act 2005 Overseas Investment Regulations 2005 |
More information | David Gilbert Minter Ellison Rudd Watts (Auckland) PO Box 3798 AUCKLAND 1140 |