Applicant
Blackfish Limited
Case number(s)
201020062
Decision date
Type
Decision
DecisionConsent Granted
Section 12(a) Overseas Investment Act 2005
Decision date22 December 2010
Investment

An overseas investment in sensitive land, being the Applicant's acquisition of:

  • a freehold interest in 15.1837 hectares of land at 498 Kowhai Rd, Springfield; and
  • a freehold interest in 21.2000 hectares of land at 21.2ha at SHW 73, Springfield.
Consideration$530,000
ApplicantBlackfish Limited
Simon Thomas Harvey, Australia (21.71%)
Duncan James Bull, Australia (21.645%)
Michael James Sleigh, New Zealand (19.998%)
Timothy Paul Allan, New Zealand (10.002%)
Christopher Peter Rose, Australia (7.215%)
Peter Francis Rose, Australia (7.215%)
Joe Nakat, Australia (7.215%)
David Carson Murray, New Zealand (1.0%)
Frederick David Justin Murray, New Zealand (1.0%)
Christopher David Milne, New Zealand (1.0%)
Humphrey John Davy Rolleston, New Zealand (1.0%)
Richard George Nelson Rookes, New Zealand (1.0%)
Vendor - 498 Kowhai RoadMichael James Sleigh
New Zealand (100%)
Vendor - SHW 73Department of Conservation
The Crown, New Zealand (100.0%)
Background

This investment is one of a series of applications to enable further development of Porters Ski Area (Porters) in Canterbury. The development plan for Porters includes the construction of a new alpine village which is believed to be the largest current proposed tourism development in New Zealand.

This application is required to enable a land swap agreement between Blackfish Limited and the Department of Conservation (DOC). Under the agreement, DOC will exchange 21 hectares of the land currently used for Porters for 15 hectares of ecologically valuable land adjoining Lords Bush Reserve (which is being acquired by Blackfish Limited from Michael Sleigh).

The land swap will enhance the ecological viability of Lords Bush Reserve and allow the continued development of Porters.

The overseas investment transaction has satisfied the criteria in section 16 of the Overseas Investment Act 2005. The 'substantial and identifiable benefit to New Zealand' criteria were satisfied by particular reference to the following factors:

Overseas Investment Act 2005
17(2)(a)(i) – Creation/Retention of jobs
17(2)(a)(v) – Additional investment for development purposes
17(2)(b) – Indigenous Vegetation/Fauna

Overseas Investment Regulations 2005
28(a) – Consequential Benefits
28(e) – Previous investments

More informationMary Digiglio
Swaab Attorneys
GPO Box 35
Sydney 20001

Download a printable version of this summary (pdf 40KB).